STUDYCASE
A real proceeding, with real audio

A real United States Supreme Court oral argument.

Press play. You are hearing the Court's own recording of a real argument, with the Court's official transcript settling in sync. The Studycase coach adds a cited case card when a moment earns one. The coaching was captured once against the real system and is replayed here; nothing is live-generated for you, and nothing is invented.

REAL AUDIO · OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT COACHING · CAPTURED REPLAY
Smith v. Arizona No. 22-899 · Supreme Court of the United States
STUDYCASE · REAL PROCEEDING 0:00

Transcript (the Court's official record)

Press play. The transcript builds here as the argument runs.

Your notes (what a viewer might type, answered by the coach)

As the argument runs, a viewer jots a question, and the coach answers it. The typed notes are illustrative; the answers are the real model, captured once.

The law behind it (cited authority)

A card appears when a moment earns one. Otherwise the coach stays silent.

Real proceeding, illustrative coaching. Not legal advice. The audio and transcript are a real, public-domain U.S. Supreme Court oral argument (17 U.S.C. § 105). The coach cards are generated by Studycase as a study aid and shown as a captured replay; every case is a real document from our corpus, quoted for practice. Studycase is a tool for moot-court and mock-trial practice, so verify every authority independently before relying on it.

Why the audio is the clock

The transcript highlight and every coach card fire off the real recording's playhead. Seek anywhere and both follow. No official word-timings ship with the transcript, so lines are spaced by an estimated speaking rate from the argument's start; minor drift is honest.

Captured once, replayed at $0

We ran the real retrieval brain and the citation gate over this argument ONE time and committed the result. Every visitor replays that same capture, with no live model call, so the demo costs nothing to serve.

An honest test of the coach

Studycase is tuned for live trial hearings; a Supreme Court argument is appellate question-and-answer. On this content the coach is deliberately conservative: it surfaces the controlling authority on the issue and stays quiet rather than fire weak cards.