STUDYCASE
The court-audio library

Real Texas & Supreme Court arguments, coached in real time.

Studycase is built on Texas law, so the library leads with real Supreme Court of Texas oral arguments, alongside the U.S. Supreme Court. Press play: you hear the court's own recording, watch the transcript settle into sync, and the Studycase coach adds a cited case card whenever a moment earns one. The Texas courts publish no argument transcript, so those are machine (ASR) drafts, labeled as such; the SCOTUS entries use the Court's official transcript. The coaching was captured once against the real system and replayed here. Nothing is live-generated for you, and nothing is invented.

REAL COURT AUDIO TX: MACHINE TRANSCRIPT · SCOTUS: OFFICIAL COACHING · CAPTURED REPLAY

Choose a proceeding

STUDYCASE · REAL PROCEEDING 0:00

Transcript: the Court's official record

Pick a case above and press play. The transcript builds here as the argument runs.

Your notes: what a viewer might type, answered by the coach

As the argument runs, a viewer jots a question, and the coach answers it. The typed notes are illustrative; the answers are the real model, captured once.

The law behind it: cited authority

A card appears when a moment earns one. Otherwise the coach stays silent.

Real proceedings, illustrative coaching. Not legal advice. The audio is real: the U.S. Supreme Court clips are public-domain federal works (17 U.S.C. § 105); the Texas clips are public records of the Supreme Court of Texas, published at txcourts.gov. SCOTUS entries quote the Court's official transcript; the Texas courts publish none, so those transcripts are machine (ASR) drafts made by Studycase: not official, may contain errors, and not diarized (no line is attributed to a named justice). The coach cards are generated by Studycase as a study aid and shown as captured replays; every case is a real document from our corpus, quoted for practice, cited to its court and year (and to its reporter when the corpus copy carries one). Studycase is a tool for moot-court and mock-trial practice. Verify every authority independently before relying on it.

Why these cases

Each argument was chosen because our corpus coaches it well: the retrieval brain surfaces on-point, controlling authority on the argued issue. We ran it once, kept only the cards that fire on the real doctrine, and dropped cases the corpus could not coach honestly.

The audio is the clock

Every transcript highlight and coach card fires off the recording's playhead. Seek anywhere and both follow. The Texas entries carry real per-line timings from our speech-to-text; the SCOTUS entries ship no official word-timings, so their lines are spaced by an estimated speaking rate. Either way, minor drift is honest.

Captured once, replayed at $0

We ran the real retrieval brain over each argument one time and committed the result. Every visitor replays that same capture. No live model call is made, so the library costs nothing to serve.